Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3EB975CA.90905@lapo.it>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 23:08:26 +0200
From: Lapo Luchini <lapo AT lapo DOT it>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030503
X-Accept-Language: it, en, fr, es
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: cygwin's exit status / errorlevel
References: <3EB85657 DOT 2040406 AT lapo DOT it> <20030507015801 DOT GG10709 AT redhat DOT com> <3EB8B535 DOT 3030303 AT lapo DOT it> <20030507141558 DOT GC26264 AT redhat DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <20030507141558.GC26264@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Christopher Faylor wrote:

>>I was mainly referring to the strangeness that windows errorlevel is set 
>>correct but executing from Mozilla does not... anyway, I guess enigmail 
>>people should continue on their "let's convert any 256 errorcode to 2 
>>and assume it is cygwin's fault".
>>    
>>
>Yeah, it's cygwin's "fault" for assuming that it should be compliant
>with UNIX.
>
I didn't meant that...
well, anyway.

-- 
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
lapo AT lapo DOT it (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/