Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 18:21:29 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Include cygipc in the distribution (was Re: cygipc (and PostgreSQL) XP problem resolved!) Message-ID: <20030506222129.GE10709@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20030506174725 DOT GE1652 AT tishler DOT net> <20030506212500 DOT GA10709 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 11:16:24PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote: >At the moments I've just been planning functionality, like being able to >switch user context and propogating the token. After I release >libxml2/libxslt on Friday, I could start working on this properly. But you are undoubtedly still very far away from anything which approaches cygipc functionality right? I think it's time to be pragmatic. I have been holding off on this for years now. It is not doing anyone any good to say "any day now" for the cygwin server when that is clearly not the case. If we have a better solution than cygipc at some point there's no reason why we can't obsolete cygipc and move to cygwin-daemon. No offense to you but you are the third or fourth maintainer of this code so I'm not inclined to wait any longer. And, for the purists, I know that this is a potential package discussion and that it is occurring in the cygwin mailing list rather than the cygwin-apps mailing list. I thought that maybe this deserved a wider discussion than cygwin-apps. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/