Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <001001c31349$9e8b1040$78d96f83@pomello> From: "Max Bowsher" To: , "Randall R Schulz" References: <5 DOT 2 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20030505132815 DOT 04df07a0 AT pop DOT sonic DOT net> Subject: Re: skel ~/.bashrc (was RE: HOME) Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 22:02:20 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Randall R Schulz wrote: > Hannu, Max, > > Aliases permit no manipulation of arguments or anything but simple > left-hand expansion of the alias name with a fixed replacement string. > > Shell procedures are as flexible as scripts and don't require file access. > > Don't forget to use "return" in place of "exit" in shell procedures! But that doesn't really make the *preferable*, if all you want to do is simple expansion of the alias name. I'm having to write alias-type things as functions, just so I can export them and use them in scripts. Max. > At 13:20 2003-05-05, Max Bowsher wrote: >> Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote: >> >>> $ info Bash # says that shell functions are preferable to aliases... >>> anyone who can explain? >> >> Well, I prefer shell functions because I can export them to subshells, >> whereas aliases don't permit that. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/