Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 12:21:50 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Setup very slow after choosing packages Message-ID: <20030505162150.GC1433@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <1052125541 DOT 847 DOT 6 DOT camel AT localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1052125541.847.6.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 07:05:41PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: >On Mon, 2003-05-05 at 09:33, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >> On Sun, 4 May 2003, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > >> FYI, Rob Collins is in charge of setup releases. Rob, care to comment on >> the above? If a new release is out, there's probably no need to update >> the FAQ. > >Choose one of the below: >a) Because I'm trying out the 'I'm mean' concept. >b) Because altering graph traversal code radically with no regression >test suite may introduce nasty side effects, such as dependencies not >getting installed in some circumstances, and I'd rather not have the >list inundated should that be the result of my changes. >c) Because there are a number of promised patches I'm vaguely hoping >will arrive, to be bundled in with this change, and as the situation >hasn't changed in > 6 months, I don't consider it a panic situation... >d) Because I really really am mean, and have just been hiding it all >this time.. Hmm. If I had to guess I'd go with b) and c). cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/