Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:28:13 -0700 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: basename() implementation? Message-ID: <20030501042813.GA15911@triplehelix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: joshk AT triplehelix DOT org (Joshua Kwan) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.7 required=4.5 tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, I've read the archive and apparently there is a basename function=20 floating around *somewhere* in cygwin. But what header should I use and=20 what header should I link against to use it? BTW, I'm using libtool now so *supposedly* building shlibs are fixed. Also, I would like to know why the libtool.m4 for cygwin fancies looking=20 for a fortran compiler in configure! It's totally nonsensical to me, can=20 anyone clear this up or tell me how to get rid of it? There is *no*=20 fortran code in my project. Regards, Josh --=20 New PGP public key: 0x27AFC3EE --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+sKJdT2bz5yevw+4RAuCzAKC7hqRFNhOnHtYt53glyrGqzA5gDgCgmnTj ghphX5kr+jRxYIsGhuU1VlA= =VOAi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ--