Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 11:50:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Igor Pechtchanski Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: Gareth Pearce cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin survey: Next vim version with perl support? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Thu, 1 May 2003, Gareth Pearce wrote: > > (*) Personally, I think perl support in vim would be nice, but I'm > > absolutely against adding a perl dependence to the vim package. There's > > no reason to drag in yet another 6.5M of stuff if all I want is an editor. > > If that were desirable, I'd just install emacs. > > if 'all i want is an editor' then why get vim at all. > ;) > > Gareth - no bias here, move along, nothing to see. Because the "cat/sed" combination is much harder to use :) On second thought, make that a "visual editor"... Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty. -- Leto II -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/