Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3EAFCEE2.3040406@netscape.net> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:25:54 -0400 From: Nicholas Wourms User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com CC: "Pierre A. Humblet" Subject: Re: Cygwin survey: Next vim version with perl support? References: <20030430083411 DOT GR19711 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.74.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Corinna Vinschen wrote: [SNIP] === cut here === [ ] Yes, please add perl support to the next Cygwin vim release. [X] No, go away with that. [ ] What's vim? === cut here === Corinna, I'd love to see a perl-enabled vim, however the requirement for perl-5.8.0 will not work for me. As you are aware, perl-5.8.0 is *not* working at all on WinME. Thus, I cannot have my beloved vim require me to install a broken perl on my machine. I'm trying to debug why perl-5.8.0 is broken, but still haven't discovered any conclusive evidence. I don't know if Pierre uses vim, but if he does it is likely to bite him as well if this happens. Is there no way to make this modular? Or perhaps offer two types of vim installs (like emacs-nox & emacs)? Cheers, Nicholas -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/