Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <006701c30e43$07449a40$78d96f83@pomello>
From: "Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
To: "Alex Vinokur" <alexvn AT connect DOT to>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <b8ln2c$865$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org>
Subject: Re: gcc version : 3.2 or 3.2-3 ?
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 12:32:34 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165

Alex Vinokur wrote:
> gcc -v indicate version 3.2 but not 3.2-3 (!?)

Ugh, this is becoming a FAQ.

3.2-3 means VERSION = 3.2, CYGWIN-SPECIFIC-RELEASE = 3

No packaging system that I know of attempts to insert its release number
into the version output of executables.

This issue has been mention on this list very recently.



Max.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/