Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 23:03:40 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: cat stories
Message-ID: <20030426030340.GA16433@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20030426024434 DOT GB16165 AT redhat DOT com> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0304252247410 DOT 10996-100000 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0304252247410.10996-100000@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 10:48:45PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> However to answer your question, no, I don't think adding non-POSIX
>> functions to cygwin is the way to go.  If you want to add
>> cygwin-specific code, then just check for "foo." rather than "foo".
>
>Ah.  I feel properly shamed.  I even think we've been through this
>before...

If we have, I don't remember.  If I had remembered about "foo.", I would
have stepped in earlier with that suggestion.  It didn't occur to me
until I was answering your email.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/