Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <002b01c30b85$a8ddcd10$78d96f83@pomello> From: "Max Bowsher" To: "Charles Wilson" Cc: References: <3EA8B56A DOT 9060307 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <009301c30b32$3bec5440$78d96f83 AT pomello> <3EA9C6B4 DOT 7030609 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Subject: Re: [avail for test] cvs-1.11.5-1 Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 00:51:58 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Charles Wilson wrote: > Max Bowsher wrote: > >> Charles Wilson wrote: >> >>> USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. >>> >>> But I would appreciate testing and feedback. This is an update to >>> version 1.11.5 from 1.11.0; there have been lots of changes under the >>> hood. cvs-1.11.5 adds the rlog command, as well as a number of >>> bugfixes. AFAIK, the server mode is still broken. >> >> .... >> >> >>> remote: crerepos >>> ERROR: cannot test remote CVS, because `rsh KHELDAR' fails. >>> when testing in remote mode, crerepos uses :ext: instead of >>> :fork:. However, even though I had rshd running -- it was >>> running as SYSTEM -- which means password entry is required. >>> This test expects passwordless rsh. >> >> >> This works if you set up passwordless ssh back to your own machine and set >> the envvars to point cvs at ssh rather than rsh. > > Right -- but "passwordless" ssh means that the sshd must be running as > the user you want to log in as. I was running sshd under SYSTEM...so no > luck there. Passphraseless pubkey auth works just fine with sshd as SYSTEM. > But you note that this is NOT a cvs server -- it's really logging in to > the "remote" machine via ssh and running cvs "on the 'server'". cvs > itself is not listening for incoming connections. Oops... now I see how my snippage could have caused confusion. I just left in the stuff at the top for basic context. I just wanted to say that the remote crerepos test will pass if it has the right support. I wasn't thinking about server mode. ---- Sorry about all this below: >> Also, a couple of packaging points: >> >> - I don't think re-autotooling was necessary. >> >> - Your port notes in the README don't mention the change from gdbm to >> flat-file. > > I did not change from gdbm to flat file -- at least not on purpose. In > fact, I added a lot of configury code to enable linkage to gdbm. So > your comment that "re autotooling was [not] necessary" is nonsense -- I > modified configure.in and at least one Makefile.am -- of COURSE I had to > reautotool. > >> So, this is basically stock 1.11.5, which I have been using for my >> day-to-day cvs-ing for months. > > No, after removing the autotool detritus, the patch is still 27k, and > touches the following files: ... > It's definitely NOT stock, unless I screwed up. It seems 'lsdiff' screwed up: $ lsdiff cvs-1.11.5-1.patch cvs-1.11.5/CYGWIN-PATCHES/cvs.README cvs-1.11.5/CYGWIN-PATCHES/postinstall.sh cvs-1.11.5/CYGWIN-PATCHES/setup.hint cvs-1.11.5/Makefile.in cvs-1.11.5/aclocal.m4 cvs-1.11.5/config.h.in cvs-1.11.5/configure $ Whereas fgrep '+++' shows the truth. Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/