Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3EA9C6B4.7030609@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 19:37:24 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030401 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Max Bowsher CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [avail for test] cvs-1.11.5-1 References: <3EA8B56A DOT 9060307 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <009301c30b32$3bec5440$78d96f83 AT pomello> In-Reply-To: <009301c30b32$3bec5440$78d96f83@pomello> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Max Bowsher wrote: > Charles Wilson wrote: > >>USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. >> >>But I would appreciate testing and feedback. This is an update to >>version 1.11.5 from 1.11.0; there have been lots of changes under the >>hood. cvs-1.11.5 adds the rlog command, as well as a number of >>bugfixes. AFAIK, the server mode is still broken. > > .... > > >>remote: crerepos >> ERROR: cannot test remote CVS, because `rsh KHELDAR' fails. >> when testing in remote mode, crerepos uses :ext: instead of >> :fork:. However, even though I had rshd running -- it was >> running as SYSTEM -- which means password entry is required. >> This test expects passwordless rsh. > > > This works if you set up passwordless ssh back to your own machine and set > the envvars to point cvs at ssh rather than rsh. Right -- but "passwordless" ssh means that the sshd must be running as the user you want to log in as. I was running sshd under SYSTEM...so no luck there. But you note that this is NOT a cvs server -- it's really logging in to the "remote" machine via ssh and running cvs "on the 'server'". cvs itself is not listening for incoming connections. > Also, a couple of packaging points: > > - I don't think re-autotooling was necessary. > > - Your port notes in the README don't mention the change from gdbm to > flat-file. I did not change from gdbm to flat file -- at least not on purpose. In fact, I added a lot of configury code to enable linkage to gdbm. So your comment that "re autotooling was [not] necessary" is nonsense -- I modified configure.in and at least one Makefile.am -- of COURSE I had to reautotool. > So, this is basically stock 1.11.5, which I have been using for my > day-to-day cvs-ing for months. No, after removing the autotool detritus, the patch is still 27k, and touches the following files: cvs-1.11.5/CYGWIN-PATCHES/cvs.README cvs-1.11.5/CYGWIN-PATCHES/postinstall.sh cvs-1.11.5/CYGWIN-PATCHES/setup.hint cvs-1.11.5/configure.in cvs-1.11.5/lib/system.h cvs-1.11.5/src/Makefile.am cvs-1.11.5/src/cvs.h cvs-1.11.5/src/gdbm_wrap.c cvs-1.11.5/src/gdbm_wrap.h cvs-1.11.5/src/mkmodules.c cvs-1.11.5/src/modules.c cvs-1.11.5/src/myndbm.h cvs-1.11.5/src/rcs.c cvs-1.11.5/src/sanity.sh cvs-1.11.5/src/tag.c cvs-1.11.5/windows-NT/README It's definitely NOT stock, unless I screwed up. --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/