Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 12:20:27 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Gcc 3.2.3
Message-ID: <20030425162027.GD6770@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <C9150052B112D3119E9E0004ACA6E4370399C9CA AT tepg1 DOT tepg DOT co DOT uk> <1051285751 DOT 1170 DOT 8 DOT camel AT localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1051285751.1170.8.camel@localhost>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 01:49:11AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>On Fri, 2003-04-25 at 19:14, Bruce Adams [Sunbury - Safety Products]
>wrote:
>>gcc 3.2.3 has been out a whole day.  How long before we can expect a
>>cygwin patched version to be available on the mirrors?
>
>A month or two, unless there is a critical bug affecting a large chunk
>of the user population.

Sorry but this isn't correct.  The correct answer is "I don't provide
estimates on when new packages will be made available".

cgf
(the reluctant cygwin gcc maintainer)

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/