Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <002301c30b43$cfcb2fe0$1000a8c0@BONNYRIGG>
From: "Phan Anh Tran" <patran AT san DOT rr DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0304251153391 DOT 10996-100000 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Subject: Re: GCC 3.2.3 question
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 09:00:37 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

Igor,

Thanks!  That cleared up a lot :-)

Anh

----- Original Message -----
From: "Igor Pechtchanski" <pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
To: "Phan Anh Tran" <patran AT san DOT rr DOT com>
Cc: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 8:56 AMIgor,
Subject: Re: GCC 3.2.3 question


> On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, Phan Anh Tran wrote:
>
> > HI,
> >
> > I used setup.exe (from cygwin.com) and downloaded GCC 3.2.3, but
> > gcc --version says that it is 3.2.  I have only one gcc installed in the
> > system.  Just want to confirm I got the right GCC.
> >
> > gcc (GCC) 3.2 20020927 (prerelease)
> > Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is
NO
> > warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
PURPOSE.
> >
> >
> > Btw, is cygwin GCC 3.2.3 the same as official GCC 3.2.3 (released just 1
day
> > ago).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Anh
>
> Anh,
>
> Look again at the version numbers carefully.  You didn't download
> gcc-3.2.3, you've downloaded gcc-3.2-3.  The "-3" indicates the
> Cygwin-specific package number and patch level, which is not part of the
> GCC version.
>
> As Robert indicated in
<http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-04/msg02199.html>,
> don't expect to see gcc 3.2.3 in the Cygwin distribution for another
> couple of months.
> Igor
> --
> http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
>       |\      _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu
> ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com
>      |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-' Igor Pechtchanski
>     '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!
>
> Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty.
>   -- Leto II
>
>



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/