Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3EA72B97.7070904@attglobal.net> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 17:11:03 -0700 From: Doug VanLeuven User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030401 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: SSH, Samba, smbnetsec and chmod References: <000001c309e6$bcc41140$b226f6c0 AT sherbert> In-Reply-To: <000001c309e6$bcc41140$b226f6c0@sherbert> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Stephen Sherbert wrote: >I just wish there was a way to have a Samba mapped drive show up >correctly in cygwin. Both of my cases show a different problem, but I >think case 1 is the lesser of the 2. So I will stick with smbntsec set >to ON. I can manually build my known_hosts file as well. > >Perhaps someone will have a suggestion I have not thought of. > I use this scenario myself & it can work. Make sure the samba share is guest ok = No nt acl support = yes So the user & group have a chance to map correctly with smbntsec in force. Regards, -- Doug VanLeuven -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/