Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin patch numbers From: Robert Collins To: Peter S Tillier Cc: Cygwin In-Reply-To: <000201c30915$dcf96180$5c16989e@oemcomputer> References: <000201c30915$dcf96180$5c16989e AT oemcomputer> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-BX5cAjvIgxbewECHydc5" Organization: Message-Id: <1051048462.842.133.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: 23 Apr 2003 07:54:22 +1000 --=-BX5cAjvIgxbewECHydc5 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 17:19, Peter S Tillier wrote: > Folks, >=20 > I notice that the Cygwin developers use a standard naming convention for > the packages containing, for example gawk and sed. This convention is > based upon the tool's version number and various patch levels, such as: >=20 > gawk-3.1.2-2.tar.bz2 Beep, wrong. See http://www.cygwin.com/setup.html. Summary: the -2 is the package update level, not a patch level. Rob --=20 GPG key available at: . --=-BX5cAjvIgxbewECHydc5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+pboOI5+kQ8LJcoIRArfLAKCMcA+LueyU0CByplZ82TSV0UOWyACfW+Df eimbAtyC82ya4F1ZasOPG8w= =jfNV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-BX5cAjvIgxbewECHydc5--