Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <001101c30917$fbf597a0$78d96f83@pomello> From: "Max Bowsher" To: "Peter S Tillier" , "Cygwin" References: <000201c30915$dcf96180$5c16989e AT oemcomputer> Subject: Re: Cygwin patch numbers Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 22:41:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Peter S Tillier wrote: > Folks, > > I notice that the Cygwin developers use a standard naming convention for > the packages containing, for example gawk and sed. This convention is > based upon the tool's version number and various patch levels, such as: > > gawk-3.1.2-2.tar.bz2 > > However when gawk --version is executed the version number only displays > as 3.1.2 (the GNU awk version/patch number). Would it be possible for > the Cygwin patch number (the -2 above) to be included in the version > number for each tool/package please? I doubt that most Cygwin package maintainers are going to hunt out version strings and change them - especially since this part of a patch would cause a conflict every time they started work on a new version. In any case: $ cygcheck -c gawk Cygwin Package Information Package Version gawk 3.1.2-2 Use -h to see help about each section $ Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/