Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:58:37 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-rcm AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Licensing fee for cygwin 1.3.X
Message-ID: <20030422145837.GB18471@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20030421234935 DOT 28536 DOT qmail AT web11203 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <20030422083343 DOT GA11865 AT pool DOT informatik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030422083343.GA11865@pool.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 10:33:43AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 04:49:35PM -0700, Robert Hua wrote:
>> I am using my own custom DOS batch scripts to
>> facilitate the launching of a commercial
>> application. Some enhancements that I want to
>> make in these scripts require more complex text
>> manipulation than DOS can provide, but they are
>> simple to do in a Unix shell (bash).
>> 
>> Could the Unix text commands
>> (e.g. grep, more, tail, etc) in Cygwin 1.3.x be
>> used without incurring additional licensing fees?
>
>Sorry for blaspheming, but there are native Windows ports of all these tools
>available, this would free you from the cygwin dll and is probably closer to
>what you are looking for if you just need a few tools.  For example here:
>
>http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/
>
>I remember a few other sources, but i do not have links at the moment, just
>search in Google.

There are still GPL issues, however.  Using those tools would still require
including source.  You just wouldn't have to include the cygwin DLL source.

I know this is pointed out in the next message but I wanted to make this
point clear.  Cygwin didn't invent the GPL and you can't circumvent the
GPL just by not using applications that don't use Cygwin.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/