Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 09:37:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Igor Pechtchanski Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: "Karsten M. Self" cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Resolution: Re: Can't access windows shares when logged into Win2K via cygwin sshd In-Reply-To: <20030422052755.GS16154@ganymede> Message-ID: Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Tue, 22 Apr 2003, Karsten M. Self wrote: > on Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 07:41:58PM -0400, lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com (lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com) wrote: > > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > on Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 08:08:13PM +0100, Karsten M. Self (kmself AT ix DOT netcom DOT com) wrote: > > > >> On the 2K box, from within legacy MS Windows, I can access shares. I've > > >> "mapped" several of these via symlinks as /net///. Cygwin > > >> under windows can access these shares. > > >> > > >> Cygwin via remote ssh cannot access these shares. Cygwin via *local* > > >> ssh (ssh localhost; ls /net// *does* work. > > <...> > > > > > > > In an offlist response, I was asked whether or not I was not using > > > password authentication. Indeed I wasn't, relying instead on RSAKEY > > > with ssh-agent for passwordless connections. > > > This is apparently a known bug with Cygwin's SSH: > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > No, an unavoidable consequence of Windows' authentication mechanism. > > > > > you can access the remote host but not shares > > > connected to it. Falling back on password auth avoids this issue, > > > though it reduces the convenience factor. > > > > Max. > > > > > > Yes, I'm in 100% agreement with what Max says here. If my previous > > response suggested otherwise, it is incorrect. This is a consequence > > of the Windows authentication mechanism. > > Anyone have details on this or references to prior discussion? I have > to admit it was among my first thoughts, but don't know the specifics. I don't know how detailed you wanted the prior discussion to be, but this *is* mentioned in ... > I've also received several off-list responses (and requests), which I > have to say rub me a bit the wrong way. I use lists for public > discourse. Unless there's a good reason for replying privately (off > topic, your ex will hunt you down and kill you), rollow up to list. > Don't ask me for private support unless you're willing to pay my rates > for same. Hear, hear! Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty. -- Leto II -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/