Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Luciano <lucianoav AT gmx DOT net>
Subject: Re: Is Cygwin really required?
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 00:20:26 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <Xns9363D9470A2Clucianoavgmxnet@80.91.224.249>
References: <Xns9361B766BBBBAlucianoavgmxnet AT 80 DOT 91 DOT 224 DOT 249> <b7us4r$bcb$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org>
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
User-Agent: Xnews/5.03.24

That's what I was afraid of.
Thanks for enlightening me.

-- 
Luciano ES
Santos, SP - Brasil
* You barely had to scroll to read this thanks to "top posting".

<-quote-> **************************************************
Rolf Campbell wrote on 20 abr 2003:

> The Win32 version will not support posix paths.  But, other than
> that, it should still work fine.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/