Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Info: This message was accepted for relay by smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net as the sender used SMTP authentication X-Trace: UmFuZG9tSVYT5gBSiGqHMb0mPTo8dc9vLI6k2EhjFVmZIADMlr+DkuyF4xw1GIjs Message-ID: <3EA1759D.8070602@rfk.com> Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 12:13:17 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc.)" Reply-To: lhall AT rfk DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luciano , Cygwin Subject: Re: Is Cygwin really required? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Luciano wrote: > So, sed 4.0.7 for Win32 has just seen the light of day, with a few > bug fixes. Cygwin currently uses 4.0.5. Can I just drop in the new > Win32 version in my /bin directory, or do I have to wait for an ad > hoc Cygwin port? Apparently, these programs we use are linked to > Cygwin1.dll somehow... > > Countless thanks, > Which programs use cygwin1.dll? The Win32 sed 4.0.7 or all the tools provided by the Cygwin distribution? I wouldn't recommend replacing your Cygwin version of sed with some generic Win32 version. Keep'em separate because they're not the same beast (unless the Win32 verison is linked to cygwin1.dll too) -- Larry Hall lhall AT rfk DOT com RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/