Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Rolf Campbell Subject: umount usage [was: Re: (1.3.22) mount: strange 15 second delay] Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 22:30:03 -0400 Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <20030418001208 DOT GC18611 AT redhat DOT com> Reply-To: IDontLikePersonalReplies AT hotmail DOT com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <20030418001208.GC18611@redhat.com> Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 07:30:00PM -0400, Rolf Campbell wrote: >>So, realizing that this may have to do with cygwin trying to access some >>mapped drive, and timing out, I tried to use 'umount /w', to remove a mount: >>umount: /w: No such file or directory > /w is a user mount. umount --help should be instructive. Ok, should've tried that before. But, in my defence, the output from umount was kinda confusing. I would hope it would say "This is a user mount. Use umount -u to remove this". And yeah, I know, patches gracefully considered, just posting my opinion. I don't really see why umount shouldn't try to remove it as a user-mount and if it isn't, remove it as a system mount (if it can). -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/