Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 12:50:37 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-rcm AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: different c++ names mangling...
Message-ID: <20030417165037.GA12623@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <3E9E717D DOT 3070001 AT noos DOT fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3E9E717D.3070001@noos.fr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 11:18:53AM +0200, Vaillant Etienne wrote:
>There are few days, I have a discution on Mico-devel mailing
>list(mico-devel AT mico DOT org) about the MICO's port on Cygwin.  So, they
>explain me that : dll from MS VC7 and gcc 3.2 under cygwin have a
>different c++ names mangling.
>
>Have you any information ?

None beyond what you already know.  This situation isn't going to change,
unfortunately.

MSVC and gcc will probably always use different name mangling techniques.

cgf
--
Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email.
Special for spam email harvesters: send email to aaaspam AT sourceware DOT org
and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/