Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 17:15:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Igor Pechtchanski Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: "Matthew W. Roberts" cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Upgraded, CYGWIN *much* slower In-Reply-To: <20030415203534.GA1656@ottabcxyz> Message-ID: Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-ID: Content-Disposition: INLINE Matt, On Tue, 15 Apr 2003, Matthew W. Roberts wrote: > > What OS are you running? > Windows 2000 Professional Ver 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 > > > Which version of Cygwin did you have before? > Sorry, but I can't remember. It's been a couple of months or so > since I last updated. There were quite a few packages that > upgraded. FYI, you can look in /var/log/setup.log -- it keeps track of every setup invocation and is appended. For the details of the last upgrade, see /var/log/setup.log.full > > Where is the "cygcheck -svr" output? > > Attached, as requested. I used mutt to attach, hopefully it did it > right. > > > What are the symptoms/triggers of the slowdown -- is it just > > "perceived" slowness, or do you have the timings? > > Unfortunately, I don't have any timings -- the slowness is "perceived". > > One example: I've a shell script that scans a mailbox for Subject: > and From: lines and prints them: > > #!/bin/sh > > # Need a command line argument: the file name to scan > [ $# -gt 0 ] || exit > > test -s $1 && (printf "\nMail in $1:\n\n"; grep ^From: $1; echo "---"; grep ^Subject: $1) > # END SCRIPT > > It was fairly slow before (slower than on Linux, anyway). Now there > is a noticeable (3-4 second) delay after it prints out before I get > back to the command line. > > That seems to be the general theme. Much longer startup and exit > times for programs. They aren't noticeably slower when I use them, > they just take a lot longer to start up and to dump me back to the > command line. You could use the "strace" utility to see where the delays are... Also, see if you have network paths in your PATH, as mentioned in . Hope this helps, Igor > Thanks for your attention, > Matt > > >On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Matthew W. Roberts wrote: > > >> A couple of days ago I upgraded my cygwin installation using > >> setup.exe. I also upgraded setup.exe. Now, *everything* seems to > >> be much slower from sh scripts, to perl programs, to Mutt, to Vim. > >> I also saw the islower() entry point warnings reported by others. > > >> Anyone else experience this? > > >> Thanks, > >> Matthew W. Roberts -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty. -- Leto II -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/