Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 10:03:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Igor Pechtchanski Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: chmod again (Webpage Alert) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII; FORMAT=flowed Content-ID: On Tue, 15 Apr 2003, John Williams wrote: > Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > [snip] > > Second, you might wish to attach the output of "cygcheck -svr", as per > > . > > I don't think it's a bug, I just need to figure out the syntax to > achieve what I want to to! The cygcheck output is attached: There have been more and more statements of this nature on the list (i.e., "it's not a bug" when referring to bugs.html). Perhaps we could move the cygcheck section of bugs.html to something like sysinfo.html, and link to it from bugs.html? This way, when referred to the webpage, people's first reaction won't be "it's not a bug, so it doesn't apply to me". Besides, the ESR essay on the same page discourages calling anything a "bug" in the initial post, and people probably feel that if they follow the instructions in bugs.html, their report would be considered a bug report, so they don't even bother to read further. Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty. -- Leto II -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/