Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 09:20:11 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: chmod again Message-ID: <20030415132011.GA6844@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20030415043915 DOT GA3652 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 12:53:18AM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 11:47:39PM -0400, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, >> Inc.) wrote: >> >I tried 'ntea' here on 1.3.22 and it works fine for me on FAT (see below). >> >> I duplicated the error on FAT32 but it works on FAT. Weird. Maybe EA >> isn't implemented on FAT32? Remember that FAT32 didn't exist until... >> hmm... was it XP or 2000? > >My unnamed sources indicate that FAT32 was introduced in Win95 OSR 2.0. I was talking about NT style kernels since we are talking about extended attributes which aren't implemented on Windows 9x. FAT32 wasn't supported there until some time after NT4.0. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/