Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "BB" Subject: Re: proposed mkpasswd change Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 15:09:30 -0500 Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: <20030411170743 DOT GA635217 AT Worldnet> Reply-To: "BB" X-Complaints-To: usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 "Pierre A. Humblet" wrote in message news:20030411170743 DOT GA635217 AT Worldnet... > On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 01:25:07PM -0500, BB wrote: > > I'm not sure if this is the correct group for this. > > What is the correct group to propose patches to Cygwin? > > > > As I stated in an earlier post, in order to run cron on Win9x, a SYSTEM user > > with RID 18 user needs to be defined in /etc/passwd. mkpasswd was recently > > modified to add the admin user. Would is make sense to also add SYSTEM user > > also? The only effect of this that I can see is that cron will begin to > > work a bit more. Otherwise, I don't think the extra entry in /etc/passwd > > will effect any thing. > > Or (better?) patch cron.c not to call set_cron_uid on Cygwin, as > is already the case in crontab.c > I don't think it's helpful to setuid(ROOT) on Cygwin. > > Pierre > That does sound better. Would it be a patch for all versions? On WinNT/2K/XP, if it's executed by the cygrunsv service it would run as the same user as specified when installed with cygrunsrv. The default it SYSTEM. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/