Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 20:15:29 -0600 To: Randall R Schulz , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: For The Record: HTML Email on the Internet; RFC 2557 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Reply-To: greywolf AT the-junkyard DOT net References: <5 DOT 2 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20030410160138 DOT 024b4998 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> From: "Chalres "grey wolf" Banas" Organization: the Junkyard Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.2.20030410160138.024b4998@pop3.cris.com> User-Agent: Opera7.0/Win32 M2 build 2637 On Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:16:35 -0700, Randall R Schulz wrote: > To Whom It May Concern, > > The IETF publishes this standard for electronic mail on the Internet > using HTML and even supports resource references in the HTML whose > targets (images, sounds, etc.) can be incorporated into the same MIME > message as the HTML body. > > In my opinion, it's simply foolish to anchor electronic mail in the pre- > markup, pre-media days of text-only electronic communication. > > Randall Schulz > really, though, just because there's a standard defined to it, why waste bandwidth, time, money, and resources on something not everyone wants to see or use? it seems to me, IMHO, that you're trying to convert everyone who prefers plain-text. you. are. wasting. your. time. and mine. we all know your opintion, and i've made mine known. so end the argument here. now. -- Charles "grey wolf" Banas http://the-junkyard.net tech advisor -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/