Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <5.2.1.1.2.20030409153853.00fda388@pop3.cris.com> X-Sender: rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 15:41:56 -0700 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Randall R Schulz Subject: Re: H.T.M.L. (RE: Getting home directory in Windows 2000 environment) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Igor, At 15:35 2003-04-09, you wrote: >On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote: > > > --- HTML contents snipped --- > > > > May I ask those of you who insist in posting in HTML format to reconsider! > > a) You're a SERIOUS virus security risk! > > b) You're polluting email > > c) Attached images add an unnecessary burden on email downloads > > > > ... > > > > /Hannu E K Nevalainen, Mariefred, Sweden > > [Outlook* instructions snipped] > >FYI, there is another reason, probably of more importance to the posters: >Using HTML mail equates your message with spam in the eyes of the message >archiving software, and a copy of the raw message is not stored, which >prevents people reading the list through the archive (e.g., me), from >answering your query. I didn't know that. Personally, I don't think I've ever felt the need for styled text (HTML), though attachments are necessary and that includes the occasional image. But I still defend the use of more modern presentation formats (i.e., HTML). This policy sounds prejudiced to me. > Igor Randall Schulz -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/