Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 15:10:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Igor Pechtchanski Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: Ehud Karni cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: spell on cygwin (was spell and nano) In-Reply-To: <200304071857.h37IvTGI017890@beta.mvs.co.il> Message-ID: Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Ehud Karni wrote: > Disclaimer: This mail should be sent to Igor, but Igor set the > "Mail-Followup-To:" to the mailing list. On purpose... > On Mon, 7 Apr 2003 09:58:53 -0400 (EDT), Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > > > On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Ehud Karni wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 6 Apr 2003 12:22:45 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 11:46:34PM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote: > > > > >> ncurses so no termcap files are needed. I think the cygwin provided > > > > >> version of nano is far superior as things like spell check would > > > > >> actually work, > > > > > > > > > >This would be a theory - however since no one has ported and packaged spell > > > > >to cygwin - it is not yet the (general) case. > > > > > > I use aspell . I downloaded the > > > tarball and > > > it compiled OOTB. I added a symbolic link: ispell -> aspell and it > > > works perfectly in Emacs (I don't use nano). > > > > > > Thanks to Joe Buehler for his continuing work on Cygwin Emacs (when > > > will we see 21.3 ?). > > > > > > BTW. CGF - this mail was somehow diagnosed as spam - why ? > > > > > > Ehud. > > > > > > I checked the URL. If you meant the part of how to overcome the > "False Positive" part then I already did that. If you meant I was > blocked because my mail-server was blocked - I checked, it was not. > > My mail was considered spam because something in its subject or > its text. My speculation is that it was the URLs between < > but I > wanted to hear it from people with more knowledge on the subject. > > May be I was unclear, but I don't think that CGF usual answer > ("We are just mean / hate you") is adding any useful information. I was referring to the "Subscribed" ("Note that...") part. You may want to try to re-subscribe (to either or ). The reply you'll receive from the list manager will indicate if that address was already subscribed. If it was, this would be something to take up with ... It's likely, however, that it wasn't. > > > - -- > > > Ehud Karni Tel: +972-3-7966-561 /"\ > > > > FYI, according to RFC 2646, the Usenet convention for signature separators > > is "^-- \n" (see , section 4.3). > > Igor > > My email (create automatically by Emacs) has the "^-- \n" as needed, > but the pgp signing (done by gnupg) is altering this line. I assume > it conform to the RFC for electronic (clear) signing, Please check. > Ehud. Quite possible. I don't use PGP, so this'll have to be confirmed by someone who does. Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty. -- Leto II -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/