Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 00:28:43 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: spell and nano (was reply to cgf about gpl violation)
Message-ID: <20030407042843.GB21761@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <BAY2-F1896Z3LstPGtP0002025e AT hotmail DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BAY2-F1896Z3LstPGtP0002025e@hotmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 11:38:44PM +0000, Gareth Pearce wrote:
>
>>>Regards,
>>>Gareth - cygwin nano packager.
>>>(PS: Waiting for cgf's supprised look - since nano-devel's Chris complied
>>>immediately - or at least is trying too...)
>>
>>I'm very gratified at the response and indicated as much in my response
>>to nano-devel.
>>
>>cgf
>
>Just wanted to clarify that I didn't mean any criticism here.  It was 
>supposed to be a dodgy attempt at humour - I think I failed there.
>
>Back on topic - anyone experienced and interested in maintaining aspell?
>If not I think i'll have a look into it... (noting that I am very very much 
>not experienced with aspell)

I've asked for volunteers for aspell before with the typical resounding
silence as a result.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/