Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 12:22:45 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: spell and nano (was reply to cgf about gpl violation) Message-ID: <20030406162245.GC25580@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20030405183018 DOT GA27247 AT redhat DOT com> <20030406045233 DOT B51013 AT samwise DOT astyanax DOT org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 11:46:34PM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote: >Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com >From: "Gareth Pearce" >To: "Nano-devel list" >Cc: >Subject: spell and nano (was reply to cgf about gpl violation) >Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:46:34 +1000 > >(crossing to cygwin incase it might inspire someone) >> use nano; for the same reason the (webpage) nano binary uses PDcurses >rather than >> ncurses so no termcap files are needed. I think the cygwin provided >> version of nano is far superior as things like spell check would >> actually work, >This would be a theory - however since no one has ported and packaged spell >to cygwin - it is not yet the (general) case. > >Regards, >Gareth - cygwin nano packager. >(PS: Waiting for cgf's supprised look - since nano-devel's Chris complied >immediately - or at least is trying too...) I'm very gratified at the response and indicated as much in my response to nano-devel. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/