Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Originating-IP: [150.101.193.247]
X-Originating-Email: [tilps AT hotmail DOT com]
From: "Gareth Pearce" <tilps AT hotmail DOT com>
To: <fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <001101c2fb4a$2a6e0440$c99ac250 AT leper>
Subject: Re: nano and TERM
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 19:26:02 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Message-ID: <BAY2-DAV59mj0u5g6dO00061dbf@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Apr 2003 09:26:12.0508 (UTC) FILETIME=[663115C0:01C2FB55]

Hmm, unable to reproduce your problem here so far,
prehaps some more details would be useful.

Regards,
Gareth - nano packaging type guy.
----- Original Message -----
From: <fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Cc: <fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 6:05 PM
Subject: nano and TERM


> Possibly this is a slight simplification, but broadly speaking is the
> following an accurate description of things?
>
> Assuming all necessary paths exist, Windows executables (fc, for instance;
> can't find much else that's any use) can be called from within Cygwin; and
> vice-versa (ls, md5sum, diff; any number of useful others). That's why
find,
> sort, etc can be problematic, if a user ends up calling the alternative
> version to that required.
>
> Lately (can't remember when it started) I've been unable to use nano from
> outside Cygwin: I get a "Error opening terminal: cygwin" message. (On the
> other hand, pico works fine.) Please can you tell me whether this is a
minor
> correct-able glitch in nano or whether there's a deeper problem (like,
I've
> misunderstood the dual-use principle described above).
>
> Thank you.
>
> Fergus
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/