Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 18:38:39 -0600 From: Joshua Daniel Franklin To: Raymond Mardle , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Most recent release Message-ID: <20030405003839.GA1788@world-gov> References: <20030404102048 DOT 58098 DOT qmail AT web20422 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030404102048.58098.qmail@web20422.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 11:20:48AM +0100, Raymond Mardle wrote: > I'm a long time user of Cygwin (love the product) and yesterday I > installed it on a computer that I personally use, for the first time in > a number of years. I don't know if I did anything wrong but after the > installation there were no less, page or vi executables (more was also > missing but I know about that from my first installation a few years > back). There might be other things missing but everything else I've > used has been there. Have these been dropped deliberately or is it a > problem? No, now all but a minimal install are optional. There was a disagreement about wether 'less' or 'more' should be included, but in the end they were not. I don't think 'vim' was ever a candidate... doesn't everyone use 'cat' as their text editor??? You may want to read to learn out some other things that have changed since then with setup.exe -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/