Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: ronald owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 12:42:02 +0200 (CEST) From: Ronald Landheer-Cieslak X-X-Sender: ronald AT localhost DOT localdomain To: Robert Collins cc: Alan Dobkin , Cygwin Mailing List Subject: Re: setup.exe final pre-release.. In-Reply-To: <1049449032.4093.25.camel@localhost> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII I've been following this discussion from the sidelines for a while.. hope you don't mind be butting in. On 4 Apr 2003, Robert Collins wrote: > Setup doesn't have a concept of a local mirror. It has a 'local package > dir', where it caches packages during install. The mirroring scripts > around create the same layout as setup uses for that local package dir. > Setup's needs are simple: > A setup.bz2/.ini on the mirror (ftp | http) site with correct paths and > MD5 detauls. > A local dir to work from. What if support were added for a "file://" mirror? For a "file://" mirror, * Setup could work just as with http:// or ftp://, and download the thing to a local cache, * no design changes would be needed - it's just another "protocol" for downloading files, * it would not require network admins to set up an FTP or HTTP server just to have a local mirror (because most already have a file server accessible through the network which is not HTTP or FTP, this can make a real difference) Just a thought - I'm not a lawyer, so you can safely ignore me (although I am married with a lawyer.. does that help?) rlc -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/