Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Originating-IP: [12.254.208.112] X-Originating-Email: [mgainty AT hotmail DOT com] From: "Martin Gainty" To: References: <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030402183025 DOT 02a99358 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030402183025 DOT 02a99358 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030402190652 DOT 0280eea0 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> Subject: Re: Bug in Cygwin bash? Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 20:23:10 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Apr 2003 03:24:00.0348 (UTC) FILETIME=[77FD21C0:01C2F990] Would someone who has that talent be dealing with short tempered chits? I dont think so.. -M ----- Original Message ----- From: "Randall R Schulz" To: Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 8:10 PM Subject: Re: Bug in Cygwin bash? > John, > > Are you a famous composer? If so, are you _the_ famous composer? > > > At 18:58 2003-04-02, John Williams wrote: > >Randall R Schulz wrote: > >>John, > >>Yes, there's a limitation on the total volume of argument strings. > >>All Unix systems have such a limit and so does Cygwin. The limits > >>vary from system to system, though POSIX dictates a minimum value for > >>this limit. > > > >Anybody know the standard Cygwin limit off the top of their head? I'm > >guessing 32K, given what I saw with mkdep > > You shouldn't want to know this. If anything, you should want to know > the POSIX minimum for this limit. > > > >>For cases where the total list of files can be processed in pieces, > >>the xargs command will do the divvying up for you, invoking the > >>command as many times as needed to process all the arguments it reads > >>from standard input. Check it out--it should be in your > >>script-writing repertoire. > > > >Yup - I used xargs in my solution to this problem. It seems not many > >people build linux kernels under cygwin - I think if they did, this > >issue I've found would have been reported earlier, because it's the > >first step in the kernel configuration process. > > I'm guessing very few Linux kernels get built under Cygwin, but I could > be wrong. > > That tyrant CGF, who won't let me leave, uses Linux to build Cygwin. Is > that irony or hypocrisy? (Right, right. It's "pragmatism.") > > > >Thanks for your reply, > > > >John > > > Randall Schulz > > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/