Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030402190652.0280eea0@pop3.cris.com>
X-Sender: rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 19:10:00 -0800
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Randall R Schulz <rrschulz AT cris DOT com>
Subject: Re: Bug in Cygwin bash?
In-Reply-To: <b6g7vu$mrq$1@main.gmane.org>
References: <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030402183025 DOT 02a99358 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com>
 <b6g4tu$e1n$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org>
 <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030402183025 DOT 02a99358 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

John,

Are you a famous composer? If so, are you _the_ famous composer?


At 18:58 2003-04-02, John Williams wrote:
>Randall R Schulz wrote:
>>John,
>>Yes, there's a limitation on the total volume of argument strings. 
>>All Unix systems have such a limit and so does Cygwin. The limits 
>>vary from system to system, though POSIX dictates a minimum value for 
>>this limit.
>
>Anybody know the standard Cygwin limit off the top of their head?  I'm 
>guessing 32K, given what I saw with mkdep

You shouldn't want to know this. If anything, you should want to know 
the POSIX minimum for this limit.


>>For cases where the total list of files can be processed in pieces, 
>>the xargs command will do the divvying up for you, invoking the 
>>command as many times as needed to process all the arguments it reads 
>>from standard input. Check it out--it should be in your 
>>script-writing repertoire.
>
>Yup - I used xargs in my solution to this problem.  It seems not many 
>people build linux kernels under cygwin - I think if they did, this 
>issue I've found would have been reported earlier, because it's the 
>first step in the kernel configuration process.

I'm guessing very few Linux kernels get built under Cygwin, but I could 
be wrong.

That tyrant CGF, who won't let me leave, uses Linux to build Cygwin. Is 
that irony or hypocrisy? (Right, right. It's "pragmatism.")


>Thanks for your reply,
>
>John


Randall Schulz 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/