Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3E8B6B5D.8000501@cygwin.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 08:59:41 +1000
From: Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
X-Accept-Language: en-au, en, en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rainer Typke <rainer DOT typke AT cs DOT uu DOT nl>
CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: bug with setup.exe: saw tetex-beta even though I did not select
 prev
References: <3E8B1752 DOT 1040207 AT cs DOT uu DOT nl>
In-Reply-To: <3E8B1752.1040207@cs.uu.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Rainer Typke wrote:
> 
> I think that setup.exe presented the tetex-beta version in the list even 
> though I did not select [prev].
> 

Thi is by design. We have a single namespace for all packages, even if 
they don't have [curr] elements. In fact prev only elements get promoted 
to curr.

But:
You should still have recieved consistent packages, what didn't get 
installed?

Rob


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/