Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3E8B1752.1040207@cs.uu.nl>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 19:01:06 +0200
From: Rainer Typke <rainer DOT typke AT cs DOT uu DOT nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: bug with setup.exe: saw tetex-beta even though I did not select prev
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello,

 I encountered the following problem with the cygwin setup.exe.

Two days ago, I started the current version of setup.exe from within my 
browser.
I went to the mirror in Esslingen (fh-esslingen.de).
Accidentally, I selected tetex-beta even though I just wanted tetex. I 
then changed my mind and selected tetex.
As a result, the dependencies were not checked correctly, and I 
installed an incomplete set of modules. This in turn lead to lilypond 
not finding the feta font although it was available.

I think that setup.exe presented the tetex-beta version in the list even 
though I did not select [prev].

With best regards,

Rainer Typke


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/