Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 20:14:22 -0500 (EST) From: Igor Pechtchanski Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: Rolf Campbell cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Aliases no longer defined? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Rolf Campbell wrote: > Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > P.S. On an unrelated note, the use of shell functions is recommended over > > the use of aliases. > > Why is that? This is according to the information on the bash info page: For almost every purpose, shell functions are preferred over aliases. The section on aliases preceding that phrase lists the limitations of the alias mechanism. FWIW, the bash man page contains a similar sentiment. I should have clarified, however, that the above P.S. only refers to bash. Aliases are still very much alive and used in csh and other shells. Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty. -- Leto II -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/