Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3E87C69A.8040809@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 23:39:54 -0500
From: "David A. Cobb" <superbiskit AT cox DOT net>
Reply-To: Cygwin Discussion <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, Superbiskit AT cox DOT net
Organization: CoxNet User
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030329
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cygwin Discussion <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: FAQ HTML ISSUE: Frames Poorly Proportioned
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I went to the FAQ and found that, strangely, the upper frame containing 
all the meat of the text was very small, while the lower frame 
containing only about 1-1/2 inches of content was much larger.  Now I 
know well that you'all produce good looking pages ( NO sarcasm intended 
), so I blamed my browser.

The Mozilla crew responded as follows.  If they're right, the HTML 
should be changed.  ISTR that it would be possible to size the bottom 
frame absolutely and let the upper frame occupy the rest of the 
canvas.   Maybe  < . . . rows="*,1.5in">.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	[Bug 199907] Sizing of horizontally-tiled frames is wrong - 
upper frame too small. (Quirks mode)
Date: 	Sun, 30 Mar 2003 20:08:56 -0800 (PST)
From: 	bugzilla-daemon AT mozilla DOT org
To: 	superbiskit AT cox DOT net



http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199907


moz AT placenamehere DOT com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |moz AT placenamehere DOT com




------- Additional Comments From moz AT placenamehere DOT com  2003-03-30 20:08 -------
Source of document shows the bottom frame is defined as 2x the theight of the top:

<frameset rows="*,2*">
<frame name="upper" src="faq_frtoc.html">
<frame name="lower" src="lower.html">
</frameset>

Which is what I'm seeing on the following OS X browsers:
Moz 1.3
Moz 3/29
Camino 3/27
Safari
IE 5.2.2

This looks INVALID to me.

reporter, can you please attach scrren shots of what you think is "right" and
"wrong"



-- 
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By God's Grace I am a Christian man, by my actions a great sinner." -- The Way of a Pilgrim; R. M. French, tr.
Life is too short to tolerate crappy software.
.



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/