Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 17:56:50 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: CVS Tags for 1.3.22
Message-ID: <20030330225650.GD24994@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0303302008030 DOT 16807-100000 AT clinux DOT mercury DOT muc DOT de> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0303301744230 DOT 21921-100000 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0303301744230.21921-100000@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 05:52:59PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 cm1 AT mercury DOT muc DOT de wrote:
>> I couldn't find any CVS tags to build Cygwin 1.3.22 from source; the best
>> I could find was the branch "dontuse-21" which doesn't seem to be correct.
>> Is there some documentation around this somewhere on the Cygwin web pages?
>> If not, could someone let me know which tags/time stamps to use? I don't
>> want to get the 64-bit file offsets which are being worked on in the trunc
>> version by accident....
>>
>> Furthermore, is there some documentation about the tags to use for the
>> support libs such as "newlib"?
>
>This issue has been raised before.  The tags are for cgf's convenience
>only.  There are no guarantees that they would correspond to any
>particular version of the release.  One way of figuring out the CVS
>timestamp to check out is downloading the corresponding source package and
>looking at its timestamps...  I'm not sure how the timestamps will now
>interact with the development on separate branches, though.  Other ways
>may be suggested by people here.

The only branches that are actively being worked on are my branch and
the trunk.  There is nothing happening on any other branch.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/