Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 16:37:14 +0100 (MET) From: for_spam AT gmx DOT de To: rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="========GMXBoundary307981048779434" Subject: Fwd: Re: Another GPL violation: Re: Minimalistic Build-Environmentforwin32 (~7.5MB) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Authenticated-Sender: #0014640924 AT gmx DOT net X-Authenticated-IP: [193.96.115.130] Message-ID: <30798.1048779434@www22.gmx.net> X-Flags: 0001 --========GMXBoundary307981048779434 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit nobody is perfect ;) now lets be friends again and make the world a better place with OpenSource Software - ok ? :) regards Roland --- Weitergeleitete Nachricht / Forwarded Message --- Date: 27 Mar 2003 20:47:26 +1100 From: Robert Collins To: for_spam AT gmx DOT de Subject: Re: Another GPL violation: Re: Minimalistic Build-Environmentforwin32 (~7.5MB) > On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 20:33, for_spam AT gmx DOT de wrote: > > > > > > On the rockbox mailinglist i used a VALID email address > > for_spam seemed invalid at first glance - it *appears* to be a black > hole address. > > > - and on my win32 > > sdk page is a VALID > > email adress, too. > > I didn't see that. I stumbled across your posting about the binaries > whilst searching for something in the cygwin mailing lists - pure > chance. > > > It would have been no problem to have me contacted and > > told me personally "hey - you don`t adhere to the GPL - please fix > that". > > > > Instead of that, i`ve been somewhat "pilloried" on this mailinglist - > an > d > > that`s what made me > > angry and my answers somewhat "defiant". > > It was never my intention to pillory (sic?) you. I didn't realise your > address was valid, and when we discussed privately, it was only after > you suggested that the GPL was not clear that I figured other folk here > might be more clear - and ASKED you before posting back to the list. > > Rob > -- > GPG key available at: . > -- +++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++ Bitte lächeln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage! --========GMXBoundary307981048779434 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+gsiuI5+kQ8LJcoIRAssEAJ0Q5okQmWVcmsD9L6IpgjVMbvbGSQCgrtyr t6QtnqQN918jDp0scugWKQo= =KQ+w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --========GMXBoundary307981048779434 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ --========GMXBoundary307981048779434--