Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: ronald owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 10:54:36 +0100 (CET) From: Ronald Landheer-Cieslak X-X-Sender: ronald AT localhost DOT localdomain To: Shankar Unni cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: RPM-4.1 port to Cygwin available In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Shankar Unni wrote: > Yann Crausaz wrote: > > The version of setup.exe I propose must be a bit old, isn't it ? If there's > > a real interest, I'm OK to care about the latest version, but will poeple > > really use RPM under Cygwin ? > The real benefit to porting RPM or apt-get or whatever to Windows is as > a possible replacement for the current installation system (if anyone > considers RPM, and its associated GUIs, an improvement, that is). I can see it now: "I downloaded the abcdef RPM from my local LUG mirror and it didn't work - why?" .. umm.. Linux executable? I really think it is a Good Thing to have a Windows application that has no equivalent under *NIX take care of Cygwin installation - only a few days ago someone tried to run what he called a "Standard Binary" (i.e. a Linux executable) under Cygwin and I'm *sure* that will happen a *lot* more often if we use one of the more-or-less standard installers from Linux distributions to install our stuff.. rlc -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/