Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:50:25 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Possible GPL Violation
Message-ID: <20030327055025.GB17191@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <02ae01c2f411$92568400$cf6d86d9 AT ellixia> <02b401c2f411$ec92cbe0$cf6d86d9 AT ellixia> <20030327035522 DOT GA16115 AT redhat DOT com> <20030327051747 DOT GA3452 AT world-gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030327051747.GA3452@world-gov>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 11:17:47PM -0600, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
>While I agree, doesn't it make more sense to contact people off-list
>first?  If this was gpl AT gnu DOT org or something I'd understand, but really
>other than us being fellow Cygwin users what does it have to do with
>the cygwin@ list?

Hmm.  Maybe.  It's nice to have some support if/when there are questions
or complaints but maybe you're more apt to have complaints if the
message is somehow perceived as a public remonstration.

Oh well.  I've done the same thing.  Food for thought.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/