Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <031a01c2f3cd$21eb28e0$bc57893e@pomello> From: "Max Bowsher" To: "Shankar Unni" , References: <006401c2f3c8$3d082d30$0300a8c0 AT hq DOT cotagesoft DOT com> Subject: Re: setup.exe beta (testing needed - really!) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 19:11:54 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Shankar Unni wrote: > Pavel Tsekov asked: > >> Is it possible that the problematic box has X already installed >> on it ? If there is an older version of a package already >> installed, setup will try to upgrade it. > > No, it doesn't. The "current" column is blank. Also, there are no > XFree86 packages in the download directory from before, so that's not a > factor either, I think. > > Actually, that brings up a good point: how does setup decide if a > package has been installed, and what version of it? Where does it keep > this information? /etc/setup/installed.db > Perhaps I had once installed and then removed XFree86 (I can't > remember), and that has left some droppings behind somewhere? More likely, it is a dependency that is pulling in XFree86. Try diffing "cygcheck -c" outputs between your 2 boxes. Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/