Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 19:33:36 +0100 (CET) From: Pavel Tsekov X-X-Sender: ptsekov AT moria DOT atlanticsky DOT com To: Shankar Unni cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: setup.exe beta (testing needed - really!) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Shankar Unni wrote: > Robert Collins wrote: > > A new release of setup.exe is imminent. There are many changes, and to > > reduce problems, feedback from YOU, is needed. > > I've been using it for a couple of days on a WinXP SP1 box and a Win2K > SP2 box. No problems on either. > > However, one of the installations has had a long-standing problem > (across all the setup versions I've tried), that I'd love to track down. > > I've always excluded (Skip) all XFree86 packages. One of the boxes > understands and remembers this - it doesn't auto-select any of the > XFree86 packages on subsequent runs of setup, but the other doesn't > remember this, and always insists on selecting a number of the XFree86 > packages, which I then have to Skip by hand each time. Is it possible that the problematic box has X already installed on it ? If there is an older version of a package already installed, setup will try to upgrade it. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/