Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 15:11:15 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Another GPL violation: Re: Minimalistic   Build-Environmentforwin32 (~7.5MB)
Message-ID: <20030325201115.GB21393@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <3E7FE4EB DOT 1040603 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <055001c2f197$65eb9990$2000000a AT schlepptopp> <1048506223 DOT 912 DOT 118 DOT camel AT localhost> <014801c2f261$f0b553c0$2000000a AT schlepptopp> <1048566137 DOT 914 DOT 209 DOT camel AT localhost> <3E7FE2EF DOT 8000900 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3E7FE4EB DOT 1040603 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <s5gfzpbcprk DOT fsf AT egghead DOT curl DOT com> <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030325094609 DOT 02bc18a0 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <s5gadfjckl2 DOT fsf AT egghead DOT curl DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <s5gadfjckl2.fsf@egghead.curl.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 02:28:09PM -0500, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
>Randall R Schulz <rrschulz AT cris DOT com> writes:
>>At 09:36 2003-03-25, Patrick J.  LoPresti wrote:
>>>Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> writes:
>>>
>>>>FWIW: I am not a lawyer.
>>>
>>>And therefore, everything you have said may be safely ignored.
>>
>>Et tu?
>
>I require neither qualifications nor evidence to argue that an activity
>is legal; all I need is to show that you lack either.  In the U.S., we
>call this "presumption of innocence".  The burden of proof is yours,
>not mine.
>
>Put another way, I do not need to be an expert in a subject to point
>out that someone else is not an expert either.

This is rather humorous.  Talking about missing the point...

He was saying that it was safe to ignore you.  I'd suggest that is the
wisest course for everyone here, in fact.  YMMV.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/