Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Another GPL violation: Re: Minimalistic Build-Environmentforwin32 (~7.5MB) From: Robert Collins To: roland Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <014801c2f261$f0b553c0$2000000a@schlepptopp> References: <055001c2f197$65eb9990$2000000a AT schlepptopp> <1048506223 DOT 912 DOT 118 DOT camel AT localhost> <014801c2f261$f0b553c0$2000000a AT schlepptopp> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-W6mQ/fNdm/XYaIsATEyw" Organization: Message-Id: <1048566137.914.209.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: 25 Mar 2003 15:22:17 +1100 --=-W6mQ/fNdm/XYaIsATEyw Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-1Bczgtk3xqTlssJlY0Tj" --=-1Bczgtk3xqTlssJlY0Tj Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bringing this back on list, with Rolands ok. On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 11:03, roland wrote: > :( > err - how to solve that ? > since installation came from cygwin setup routines months ago - how do i = know,=20 > what packages have been used (and which versions?) Your /etc/installed.db will list your current versions, and if you haven't updated since, will be accurate. > To dig into this, this will cost me HOURS ! > Any tips for an easy solution ? Sorry, not really. Use setup.exe is what comes to mind. We've spent much more than hours making it robust and easy to use. > Completely new cygwin setup ,corresponding "striptease" and packaging ? > Come on - I have no time for just doing some satisfaction for "a sheet of= paper". > If I REALLY have to do this, I will take my website down and make rockbox= people > unhappy. This package was meant to make cygwin environment easier for the= rockbox > people - nobody depends on that - it`s just for "comfort". > It doesn`t work ? > It doesn`t run ? > It corrupts your code ? > You miss a feature and NEED it ? > Throw this package away - download cygwin and install yourself ! >=20 > What would be the consequence, if i wouldn`t take care of your advice ? W= ill I get=20 > a reminder? I respect the GPL - but I also think, there could be a little= freedom for=20 > "interpretation". It`s hard enough, that we have to fiddle around with or= dinary and > absurd laws and licensing terms the rest of our life .... the GPL is what got you cygwin in the first place. Any interpretation which conflicts with the GPL is not valid. If you don't like the licence, return the product!=20 > regards > roland >=20 > ps: > There must be HOUNDREDTHOUSANDS of people violating the gpl! >=20 > On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 10:53, roland wrote: > > Hello Robert, > > I take GPL serious and didn`t see, that this is a problem.=20 > > I have added the following lines on the download page: > >=20 > > >Download rockbox-sdk_win32.tar.bz2. (store in dir c:\cygwin) > > >This package contains a minimalistic cygwin environment in binary > > form. See >www.cygwin.com for sourcecode and further information > >=20 > > Does this give satisfaction ? >=20 > Unfortunately no, you must host the matching sources yourself. > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-03/msg01623.html is a link to > another recent GPL discussion where this is pointed out. >=20 > Rob --=20 GPG key available at: . --=-1Bczgtk3xqTlssJlY0Tj Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: message/rfc822 Return-path: Envelope-to: robertc AT localhost Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by lifelesswks with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18xcdh-0003eK-00 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:50:05 +1100 Received: from pop-server.bigpond.net.au [144.135.25.13] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.0) for robertc AT localhost (single-drop); Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:50:05 +1100 (EST) Received: from mta03ps.bigpond.com ([192.168.115.162]) by mailms6ps.email.bigpond.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 mailms6ps Apr 29 2002 13:22:02) with ESMTP id HCA4Y303.89F for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:49:15 +1000 Received: from sources.redhat.com ([144.135.25.69]) by mta03ps.bigpond.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 mta03ps Jul 16 2002 22:47:55) with SMTP id HCA4Y200.300 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:49:14 +1000 Received: from sources.redhat.com ([66.187.233.205]) by psmam01.bigpond.com(MAM V3.3.2 65/7710245); 25 Mar 2003 10:49:09 Received: (qmail 17593 invoked by uid 9126); 25 Mar 2003 00:48:53 -0000 Delivered-To: rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com Received: (qmail 17587 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2003 00:48:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2003 00:48:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 10023 invoked by uid 0); 25 Mar 2003 00:48:51 -0000 Received: from pD951EFAA.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO schlepptopp) (217.81.239.170) by mail.gmx.net (mp016-rz3) with SMTP; 25 Mar 2003 00:48:51 -0000 Message-ID: <020201c2f268$69c08360$2000000a AT schlepptopp> From: "roland" To: "Robert Collins" References: <055001c2f197$65eb9990$2000000a AT schlepptopp> <1048506223 DOT 912 DOT 118 DOT camel AT localhost> <014801c2f261$f0b553c0$2000000a AT schlepptopp> <1048550791 DOT 912 DOT 200 DOT camel AT localhost> Subject: Re: Another GPL violation: Re: MinimalisticBuild-Environmentforwin32 (~7.5MB) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 01:49:37 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Evolution-Source: imap://robertc AT 192 DOT 168 DOT 0 DOT 2:993/ Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable don`t see a problem with that - but perhaps you should initiate it. regards Roland PS: If I hear from you cygwin folks: take care of the gpl! If you don`t, we wo= uld like=20 you to remove your package - I really would accept this decision because yo= u made a great job with this software and you should decide - But I really think, there a= re also many=20 people, which don`t take it that serious, as you do....... The GPL is meant to PROTECT OpenSource software - but I don`t see anything = that i`m doing=20 bad things to OpenSource or to the Opensource Community - Far from it ! ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Robert Collins" To: "roland" Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 1:06 AM Subject: Re: Another GPL violation: Re: MinimalisticBuild-Environmentforwin= 32 (~7.5MB) --=-1Bczgtk3xqTlssJlY0Tj-- --=-W6mQ/fNdm/XYaIsATEyw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+f9l4I5+kQ8LJcoIRAhFhAJ0dvMngDe7F2GXtiFcxjG4O/OFkcACeILv6 ezIyZjREOYdJj8GrMZMBzTc= =qSfN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-W6mQ/fNdm/XYaIsATEyw--