Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3E7F27F4.9070501@fillmore-labs.com> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 16:44:52 +0100 From: Patrick Eisenacher MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lhall AT rfk DOT com CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, jeff DOT hodges AT kingsmountain DOT com, rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: xsltproc segfaults after upgrading to docbook xsl stylesheetsv1.60.1 References: <232810-220033124151619673 AT M2W028 DOT mail2web DOT com> In-Reply-To: <232810-220033124151619673@M2W028.mail2web.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: eisenacher AT fillmore-labs DOT com User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 Organization: Fillmore Labs GmbH X-Complaints-To: abuse AT fillmore-labs DOT com Nobody was lashing at anybody. So let's stay with this, Larry. Patrick lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com schrieb: > If you're frustrated, imagine how frustrated Rob is receiving all these > complaints for his efforts to make this package available to you (at any > version level). Makes one wonder why anyone would spend their time to > support a package. Anyway, it's a point to ponder the next time you are > frustrated with a particular package and feel like you'd like to lash out > at someone. > > Larry > > Original Message: > ----------------- > From: Patrick Eisenacher eisenacher AT fillmore-labs DOT com > Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 13:15:28 +0100 > To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, Jeff DOT Hodges AT KingsMountain DOT com, rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: Re: xsltproc segfaults after upgrading to docbook xsl > stylesheetsv1.60.1 > > > Hi Jeff, > > I'm waiting already for more than a month for this to happen. Needless > to say, I'm pretty frustrated. But despite Robert claiming to take care > of this in his initial response you cited below, no update was ever > published. All further inquiries were silently ignored. The > interpretation of this behaviour and consequences are up to you. > > Right now, Cygwin is not usable for XML editing. I recommend switching > over to some other *nix and a VM. Alternatively you can use the Windows > ports of the xml libaries provided by Igor Zlatkovic. His ports are > always up to date: http://www.zlatkovic.com/projects/libxml/index.html > > > Disappointed, > Patrick > > >>Robert Collins said on 19 Feb 2003 07:57:58 +1100: >> >>>Yes, and this takes the current version from 'old' to 'old + buggy'. >>>I've upped my priority to get a new release out. Uhmm, end of the week >>>should do it. >> >>Please, could we/you somehow get xsltproc & associated libs in the cygwin >>installation repository brought up-to-date? I'm trying to use xsltproc > > with > >>some docbook stuff (we're using docbook to write the next phase of >>ProjectLiberty specs, and I use cygwin as my *nix environment), and said >>docbook stuff uses xinclude. The old xsltproc et al included (still) in > > the > >>cygwin install (I updated this morning) barfs on the xinclude stuff, plus > > it > >>doesn't properly handle (eg skip over) included mediaobjects (eg EPS). > > The > >>latest version of xsltproc et al (the various *xml* libs) handles both of >>these just fine. >> >>thanks, >> >>JeffH -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/