Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 21:50:54 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: 'cygpath -ml <posix_8.3_path>' bug?
Message-ID: <20030320025054.GD2052@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030319182259 DOT 02fbd330 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030319173807 DOT 02ba6d80 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 0 DOT 20030319184305 DOT 09c2eea8 AT rogue DOT codemeta DOT com> <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030319173807 DOT 02ba6d80 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030319182259 DOT 02fbd330 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030319184048 DOT 02fbba98 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20030319184048.02fbba98@pop3.cris.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 06:43:41PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
>This still doesn't make sense to me. Why does "-l" give a full Windows 
>name while "-m" gives a DOS name?

Because I'm an idiot.  You're right.  This is a bug.  However, PGA still
applies.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/